1. Gravatar Icon 1 cliff

    It’s really a shame that an artist can’t make a living by selling his or her work to those who are less privileged. Everyone can appreciate artwork, but only a select few can cut a check for $10,000 to buy a painting. The rest of us have to live with reproductions or posters.

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 Courtney

    That’s one of the moral dilemmas that an artist must face. Should your customers and patrons include members of your own community? What about donating your work for a benefit or cause that you believe in (given tax write-off limitations)? How does following your conscious effect one’s ability to earn a living?

    I don’t have any good answers to these questions, other than I feel it is important for everyone to have access to original pieces. How feasible is it to make many small works available at prices that my neighbors could afford? Could I keep up with demand? How could I later entice them to invest in larger pieces? For the collectors interested only in returns on their investments, how could I ensure that value of my works will only increase?

    I’m still trying to work all of this out myself. Ultimately, I feel it is imperative to remain true to one’s ideals, dreams and goals and not give in to the pull of money.

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 Alyson B. Stanfield

    I love this: “A myth that he worked to dispel was that the price of a work should be such so it will sell quickly.”

    Amen! If you don’t value your work, no one will. Thanks for posting. I look forward to Part II.

Leave a Reply